My morning routine, much like that of many other
digital-aged Americans, consists of a cup of coffee coupled with my Twitter
updates. I start each day with CNN, Variety and ESPN as well as the latest from
major motion picture studios and independent houses alike. In the last year, I
have noticed a trend with smaller studios in using these social media platforms
to look for and secure funding for their films. The publicity for a project in
the early stages paired with a search for investors is a drastic change from
the day in age when money was not discussed with the general public.
The money raising process has always been a difficult one
for independent filmmakers and new, creative, digital, and public methods are
beginning to become the norm. This concept is being dubbed “crowd-funding” and
allows average people the opportunity to become personally connected to a film
and therefor invested (emotionally as well as financially) in a project. As
Jeff Steele describes in his article “Independent Films’ New Path to
Financing”, this phenomenon speaks to two basic human instincts; “greed and
self interest” (2010).
http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/photo/riotous-drinking-party-in-public-bar-high-res-stock-photography/84170446 |
Documentary filmmakers have been utilizing this concept in
order to circumvent a traditional donation process, which can be lengthy and
extensive. Although this method is becoming more popular for smaller projects,
it is not 100% effective with the larger undertakings. The amount of time it
can take to raise a substantial sum through social media compared to going
through the traditional grant process is influential. YouTube and company blogs
are also being used to showcase film trailers, up-to-the-minute updates, and
personal stories about cast, crew and filming in order to bridge the personal
gap that many projects face in finding funders.
Instead of dealing with groups of face-less investors that
have no personal interest in a project, only financial, many filmmakers are
choosing to appeal to individuals who feel like they are a part of a special
project that may some day appear on the big screen. The tricky situation, as
Steele warns, is how to use these digital mediums in a more efficient and time
saving manner by making sure your audience sees a return on investment. A
producers credit is not as effective as filmmakers assume since the general
public often times do not understand the importance of the title. Frankly, if
the Executive Producer credit is over used and given out at ease, it will lose
all influence in the industry. The Academy Awards are too long as it is, if an
Oscar for Best Picture is presented to all the Twitter followers for a
production company, the telecast would last for days.
References
Steele, J. (2010, April 27). Independent films’ new path to
financing. The Huffington Post: Tech.
Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeff-steele/independent-films-new-pat_b_553044.html
No comments:
Post a Comment