Pages

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Negotiating in Hollywood


My boss is a hard-hitting Hollywood executive who has spent the last two decades in boardrooms and on film sets. Every day for him is a negotiation whether it is starting a new business, securing investors, buying a car, or convincing his lovely wife why he needs a new $7,000 video screening monitor. His life has led to many different types of negotiations and has found him on varying sides of the table. He has been bullied, the victor, the mediator, and the loser. More often than not however, he prides himself on being able to listen carefully, communicate effectively and maintain relationships in an industry where it is all about who you know. I sat down with my mentor and asked him about some of his experiences in the negotiating arena and the lessons he has learned along the way.

Q. You have been negotiating for the majority of your career with everyone from movie stars to high-powered studio executives. How do you separate the people from the problem?

A. The industry has changed a lot from when I first started twenty years ago. Emotion had no place in negotiation and the “Suits” were tough. Even when I was first rising up the ladder to an executive level, I had no tolerance for the personal side of an argument. Negotiation has really changed in the last decade or so and as I have moved to manage my own company, I see the importance and benefit of being able to address and respect the emotions of my counterpart.  I now attack every negotiation by first breaking down the problem into individual pieces in order to view them separately. This allows me to look at the facts of the discussion so that emotions can be addressed and removed. There is some degree of sympathy that must remain in even the toughest negotiations in order to keep discussions moving and keep relationships in tact. I approach this with a lot of ‘I understand’ and asking questions.

Q. How do you handle bargaining based on positions as opposed to principles and interests?

A. Logic and research {objective criteria} (Fisher, Ury & Patton, 2011, p. 86-89) are my main weapons when addressing individuals who insist on digging into their position. Logic, reason and questions allow irrationality to be brought to light and positions debunked.

Q. Give an example of how you work towards mutual benefit when negotiating a deal?

A. Establishing a common foundation is key when reaching a mutual agreement. That foundation can be built on new ideas and evaluated until an agreement is reached. In the film industry, middle ground can be hard to find and rampant egos can prevent vision, but in the 13th hour stuck in a boardroom, a middle ground can usually be seen.

Q. Has anyone ever used “dirty tricks” with you whilst negotiating? How did you react?

A. I have no tolerance for dirty tricks, even in an industry such as Hollywood where they are used daily. My confidence allows me to call someone out on their tactics. I am not opposed to telling someone that I know they are acting unprofessionally and that negotiations will cease until a professional standard is met. I am never afraid to walk out of a negotiation.

Q. Do you develop a Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA) before you enter a negotiation in order to have that confidence?

A. Before every discussion, I make sure to look at all of my options and courses of action. I am old school Hollywood in that I am always looking for the better deal and know what they are before I agree to anything.

* My boss and subject of this interview requested to remain anonymous.


References
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in
     New York, NY: Penguin Group 

Saturday, September 15, 2012

It Is As Good A Guess As Mine: Film Forecasting

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/illustration/question-mark-royalty-free-illustration/CC000552

The film industry is like any other in terms of risk, profitability and revenue generation, but the research leading up to that final decision to pull the trigger is very unique. As NewYork Times columnist Adam Davidson explains is his article “How does the film industry actually make money?”, film deals with so much more guess work than any other industry and requires a sense of comfort in the unknown. Screenwriters, producers and financiers try to look at what is currently popular, which actor is causing the most noise and what book is a current best seller, but these factors still do not guarantee an audience or profits. Market research and audience screenings can help tweak a film in post-production but the movie has already been made. There is no re-do when millions of dollars and countless resources have been utilized. Even a big named star in a CGI filmed, action packed movie based on a screenplay from the most popular book of the decade does not promise a blockbuster. There is very limited ability for producers to do any forecasting for the future or analyzing of the past, even with the “perfect” combinations, and the industries inability to break-even or make a profit verifies this point (Davidson, 2012).

A variance in this profit forecasting dilemma appears with the sense of security that comes with a sequel. A follow-up film to one that brought audiences to the theaters allows producers to forecast more accurately and therefore spend more money. A set cast, cohesive crew, and a style with proven success helps to alleviate some of the immense risk that comes with filmmaking. The most successful of this strategy comes from the multi-million dollar blockbusters packed full of action and good-looking people. Danielle Kurtzleben discusses why this method is so effective in her article “Why sequels have taken over the box office”. Sequels allow an audience to reconnect with favorite characters, save time on casting and filming, as well as the ability to reach an international market where the language barrier can be diminished by car chases and impressive graphics.

Movie sales are dwindling more every year due to at home viewing opportunities and Internet dominance and the film industry is working with no power in prediction. Investors are now looking towards other areas of entertainment, including the Internet and the surprising resurgence of television (Davidson, 2012), but the dilemma is the same. There is no way to know where an audience is going to spend their money and a human being’s fickle nature leads to huge risk and no guarantee of reward. The industry is tough though and has survived wartime, depressions, recessions, and every other economic climate imaginable. Film is steeped in history, glamour and intrigue and although the factors that contribute to that magic are unpredictable, when everything comes together and an audience responds, the rewards can vastly outweigh the risk.